18th December 2015
Companies are increasingly looking for and turning to efficient methods of concluding contracts, whether it is the use of counterparts exchanged online or ‘click to accept’ boxes on their websites. Common law requires only four elements for a valid contract to be entered into: offer, acceptance, consideration and intention to create legal relations. As long as these elements are present, concluding contracts using digital signatures should be seen as a natural evolution and perfectly effective method of contracting in the digital age.
A click-wrap agreement or licence is a common type of online contract that confirms a user’s consent to a company’s terms and conditions when purchasing or using a product or service. Generally, such agreements require the end-user or customer to click an “ok” or “I agree” button or to tick a box on a pop-up window or dialog box to be bound by the terms and conditions. On the other hand, the customer can indicate a rejection of the terms by clicking on the “cancel” button or closing the relevant window, which will indicate his refusal to enter into a contract with the provider of the goods or services.
Click-wrap agreements offer companies selling goods and/or services over the internet protections beyond those afforded by whatever intellectual property rights the company has in the goods or service. The agreements are commonly used when companies wish to ensure that their preferred position in respect of implied warranties, limitations on financial liability or the remedies available for breach of contract and/or governing law and jurisdiction prevail in their relationship with the other party.
It is impractical for many companies to have separately negotiated agreements with each customer. With the volume of traffic commercial websites hope to obtain, companies generally do not want the burden of separately coming to an agreement with every customer.
On the other hand, the vast majority of customers prefer convenience and ease when using the internet, not wanting or expecting to have to spend time and effort negotiating terms of use before purchasing or using goods and/or services.
Using click-wrap agreements tends to discourage even large purchasers from insisting on individually negotiated terms and conditions. In practice, this has the effect of increasing the bargaining position of the company providing the goods and/or service vis-a-vis the customer.
The key issue in the UK is the proper incorporation of the terms and conditions in the resulting contract. A company’s standard terms will only be incorporated into the contract, and, therefore, be legally binding on the customer, if the terms are brought to the customer’s attention before the contract is made. It is therefore imperative that the customer is able to access, read, scroll through and even download the terms before he or she agrees to the terms and conditions (i.e. by clicking an “I agree” button or ticking a box).
In a business-to-consumer context, a company should also be aware that if any of its terms and conditions contain any information that the company is required to provide consumers pre-contractually under the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013, those terms should be easily accessible through a prominent link from the company’s general web and product pages. In The consumer should not be made to go through the order process to access them.
This potential problem generally appears in a business-to-business (B2B) context. In this scenario, the online merchant must be careful to ensure that the individual clicking to accept the terms and conditions has the authority to act on behalf of the company using or purchasing the goods and/or the service. This could be achieved by including a specific reference in bold warning the customer that if he or she is contracting on behalf of a company, by clicking the “I agree” button or ticking the relevant box, the customer is confirming that they are authorised by the company to enter into the relevant agreement.
______________________
[1] El Majdoub v CarsOnTheWeb.Deutschland GmbH (C-322/14) EU:C:2015:334; [2015] I.L.Pr 32.